Search QAs

Regards the new S.14.02 QRT for 2.8 and the associated LOG guidance (in the draft business package supporting SII taxonomy 2.8.0). Would the following be an acceptable implementation for reconciliation checking of C0120 with S.17.03 (e.g. in Plausibility tests):

1. If S.17.03.01 CCCC R0010 <> 0 then S.14.02 C0120 should include S.01.02 R0050 with a test for each column in S.17.03 for columns C0020 through C0130 and the matching LoB in S.14.02 C0010 (where S.14.02 C0020 = “”, to exclude product level records in S.14.02).

I downloaded the 'Risk-Free Interest Coding' provided by EIOPA and used part of it to calculate the 'risk-free Term Structures without VA for EUR'. The results are reasonable, but they do not match the monthly results published by EIOPA (e.g., EUR_31_01_2025_SWP_LLP_20_EXT_40_UFR_3.30). My question has two parts:

I analyzed DORA and I have a couple of questions:
1. Can you share a definition of what DORA understand by "function"?
2. May you share several examples of functions that must be mapped with assets ITC, vendors and ITC services?

Is a parent company that is not a financial entity itself required to maintain the information register?

Are credit agencies that transmit credit or rating informations generally seen as ICT third-party service providers? Is there a statement that we can refer to?

Could a same Function Identifier in field B_06.01.0010 be linked to multiple options/values (including the value ‘support functions’) in field B_06.01.0020?
What is the meaning of ‘linked’ in the instruction of the field B_06.01.0020?

Is BV374 to be deleted or changed as loans on policies will get further CI codes (87, 88) due to delegation 2023/894?

Could you provide some concrete examples in which the criterion listed in Article 2, paragraph 1, 1) of IDD according to which the customer is able to directly or indirectly conclude an insurance contract using a website or other media, as part of the definition of insurance distribution, should be applied in practice?

Considering the classification of (re)insurance contracts into Lines of Business (LoB) needs to be carried out based on the nature of the underlying risks and not the form of the contracts the (re)insurance products are based on: - Should the Technical Provisions (TPs) of a proportional reinsurance treaty where 100% of the original insurance contract premiums and claims are passed on to the reinsurer (with a commission being paid to the insurer), be classified under one of the "insurance" LoBs